Understanding science, for all. Home About
Novadette› 🧬 Biology› Physiology› Animal Scaling› If you were the size of…
🧬 Physiology

If You Were the Size of…

Shrink yourself to an ant or grow into a giant, keeping your shape. Weight grows with length cubed but muscle strength only squared — which is why insects can lift many times their own weight and giants would collapse.

PhysiologyScaling lawsJust for fun
Inputs
Input examples
Everything is scaled from you, keeping the same shape and the same body materials. Strength follows muscle cross-section, energy use follows Kleiber’s M^¾ law.
You now

On Being the Right Size

Double your height and keep your shape: you become 2×2×2 = 8 times as heavy, but your muscles and bones only get 2×2 = 4 times as thick. Relative to your weight you are half as strong, and your leg bones carry twice the stress.

Shrink instead and the effect reverses: an ant-sized human could lift dozens of times their own weight and would hardly notice a fall — air resistance matters more and more as things get small. Biologist J.B.S. Haldane wrote a famous essay about it in 1926: a giant ten times our height would break his thighs with every step.

L³weight
L²muscle strength
1/Lstrength per kg
√Lfalling speed

What Scales How

scale factor
mass ∝ L³
strength ∝ L²
lift / weight ∝ 1/L
you, rescaled
Result
Enter the values above

Key Relations

Scale Factor

Every length gets s times bigger, every area s², every volume (and so the mass) s³.

Example: 
Strength

Muscle force grows with the cross-section of the muscle; the weight it must lift grows with volume.

Energy and Pulse

Kleiber’s law and the heart-rate rule from the other tabs, written with the scale factor.

Falling

Terminal speed depends on weight over drag area, so small creatures fall slowly; a human in free fall reaches about 55 m/s.

Sources & Verification

References
  1. K. Schmidt-Nielsen, Scaling: Why Is Animal Size So Important?, Cambridge University Press, 1984 — Ch. 2 (Problems of Size and Scale) and Ch. 5 (The Strength of Bones and Skeletons).
  2. M. Kleiber, “Body size and metabolism”, Hilgardia 6(11), 315–353 (1932).